|
It is currently Fri Sep 10, 2010 11:39 am
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
| Author |
Message |
|
spblat
Prolix
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 7:42 am Posts: 5573 Location: Portland
In a word: Compassionate serenity
|
 Re: Truth and persuasion
If you are not persuaded that the universe exists then I cannot persuade you of anything. Do I have to persuade you that the universe exists? If we are navel-gazing or discussing philosophy, I will only say that the universe probably exists: cogito ergo sum. If we are talking about apples and bananas and video games and mortgages, then for practical purposes you can assume I agree that the universe definitely exists. Zarniwoop pulled some notes out of a pocket.
"Now," he said, "you do rule the Universe, do you?"
"How can I tell?" said the man.
Zarniwoop ticked off a note on the paper.
"How long have you been doing this?"
"Ah," said the man, "this is a question about the past is it?"
Zarniwoop looked at him in puzzlement. This wasn't exactly what he had been expecting.
"Yes," he said.
"How can I tell," said the man, "that the past isn't a fiction designed to account for the discrepancy between my immediate physical sensations and my state of mind?"
Zarniwoop stared at him. The steam began to rise from his sodden clothes.
"So you answer all questions like this?" he said.
The man answered quickly.
"I say what it occurs to me to say when I think I hear people say things. More I cannot say."
Zaphod laughed happily.
"I'll drink to that," he said and pulled out the bottle of Janx spirit. He leaped up and handed the bottle to the ruler of the Universe, who took it with pleasure.
"Good on you, great ruler," he said, "tell it like it is."
"No, listen to me," said Zarniwoop, "people come to you do they? In ships ..."
"I think so," said the man. He handed the bottle to Trillian.
"And they ask you," said Zarniwoop, "to take decisions for them? About people's lives, about worlds, about economies, about wars, about everything going on out there in the Universe?"
"Out there?" said the man, "out where?"
"Out there!" said Zarniwoop pointing at the door.
"How can you tell there's anything out there," said the man politely, "the door's closed."
The rain continued to pound the roof. Inside the shack it was warm.
"But you know there's a whole Universe out there!" cried Zarniwoop. "You can't dodge your responsibilities by saying they don't exist!"
The ruler of the Universe thought for a long while whilst Zarniwoop quivered with anger.
"You're very sure of your facts," he said at last, "I couldn't trust the thinking of a man who takes the Universe — if there is one — for granted."
Zarniwoop still quivered, but was silent.
"I only decide about my Universe," continued the man quietly. "My Universe is my eyes and my ears. Anything else is hearsay."
"But don't you believe in anything?"
The man shrugged and picked up his cat.
"I don't understand what you mean," he said.
"You don't understand that what you decide in this shack of yours affects the lives and fates of millions of people? This is all monstrously wrong!"
"I don't know. I've never met all these people you speak of. And neither, I suspect, have you. They only exist in words we hear. It is folly to say you know what is happening to other people. Only they know, if they exist. They have their own Universes of their own eyes and ears."
Trillian said:
"I think I'm just popping outside for a moment."
She left and walked into the rain.
"Do you believe other people exist?" insisted Zarniwoop.
"I have no opinion. How can I say?"
"I'd better see what's up with Trillian," said Zaphod and slipped out.
Outside, he said to her:
"I think the Universe is in pretty good hands, yeah?"
"Very good," said Trillian. They walked off into the rain.
Inside, Zarniwoop continued.
"But don't you understand that people live or die on your word?"
The ruler of the Universe waited for as long as he could. When he heard the faint sound of the ship's engines starting he spoke to cover it.
"It's nothing to do with me," he said, "I am not involved with people. The Lord knows I am not a cruel man."
"Ah!" barked Zarniwoop, "you say 'The Lord'. You believe in something!"
"My cat," said the man benignly, picking it up and stroking it, "I call him The Lord. I am kind to him."
"Alright," said Zarniwoop, pressing home his point, "How do you know he exists? How do you know he knows you to be kind, or enjoys what he thinks of as your kindness?"
"I don't," said the man with a smile, "I have no idea. It merely pleases me to behave in a certain way to what appears to be a cat. Do you behave any differently? Please, I think I am tired."
Zarniwoop heaved a thoroughly dissatisfied sigh and looked about.
"Where are the other two?" he said suddenly.
"What other two?" said the ruler of the Universe, settling back into his chair and refilling his whisky glass.
"Beeblebrox and the girl! The two who were here!"
"I remember no one. The past is a fiction to account for ..."
"Stuff it," snapped Zarniwoop and ran out into the rain. There was no ship. The rain continued to churn the mud. There was no sign to show where the ship had been. He hollered into the rain. He turned and ran back to the shack and found it locked.
The ruler of the Universe dozed lightly in his chair. After a while he played with the pencil and the paper again and was delighted when he discovered how to make a mark with the one on the other. Various noises continued outside, but he didn't know whether they were real or not. He then talked to his table for a week to see how it would react. Do you have to persuade me that the universe exists? You tell me.
_________________ "You're very sure of your facts," he said at last, "I couldn't trust the thinking of a man who takes the Universe—if there is one—for granted." -- Douglas Adams
Are you on Facebook? Become a DH fan!
|
| Fri Jan 29, 2010 2:45 pm |
|
 |
|
Arlo
Loquacious
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 8:05 am Posts: 1291
In a word: Christian
|
 Re: Truth and persuasion
No, I don't have to convince you. I know you know the universe exists.
_________________ Romans 1:20
|
| Fri Jan 29, 2010 3:21 pm |
|
 |
|
spblat
Prolix
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 7:42 am Posts: 5573 Location: Portland
In a word: Compassionate serenity
|
 Re: Truth and persuasion
Groovy. Then what of my earlier question, restated below?
Assuming there is such a thing as absolute truth, persuasion is required to bring someone around to your point of view.
Assuming truth (or our perception of it) is relative, persuasion is required to bring someone around to your point of view.
Do you agree with these statements?
_________________ "You're very sure of your facts," he said at last, "I couldn't trust the thinking of a man who takes the Universe—if there is one—for granted." -- Douglas Adams
Are you on Facebook? Become a DH fan!
|
| Sat Jan 30, 2010 9:24 am |
|
 |
|
Arlo
Loquacious
Joined: Fri Sep 19, 2008 8:05 am Posts: 1291
In a word: Christian
|
 Re: Truth and persuasion
Quote: Do you agree with these statements? Quote: Assuming there is such a thing as absolute truth, persuasion is required to bring someone around to your point of view.
I do not agree with this statement. Absolute truth is absolutely true. There is no assuming it to be true. The universe absolutely truly exists. I don't have to persuade you of this truth. Quote: Assuming truth (or our perception of it) is relative, persuasion is required to bring someone around to your point of view. I do not agree with this statement. Truth is never relative. Truth is always true. Persuasion is not required, the universe truly does exist.
_________________ Romans 1:20
|
| Sun Jan 31, 2010 4:17 pm |
|
 |
|
spblat
Prolix
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 7:42 am Posts: 5573 Location: Portland
In a word: Compassionate serenity
|
 Re: Truth and persuasion
Suppose you believe something to be true. Suppose I do not share your belief. Suppose you want me to understand the truth as you do. Is this a scenario that seems plausible?
_________________ "You're very sure of your facts," he said at last, "I couldn't trust the thinking of a man who takes the Universe—if there is one—for granted." -- Douglas Adams
Are you on Facebook? Become a DH fan!
|
| Sun Jan 31, 2010 6:31 pm |
|
 |
|
gomtuu77
Founding Member
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 8:37 pm Posts: 3601
In a word: Christ Follower
|
 Re: Truth and persuasion
Suppose you believe something to be true. Suppose I do not share your belief. Suppose you want me to understand the truth as you do. Is this a scenario that seems plausible? Yeah, that's a plausible scenario, but I would add a certain caveat. Hopefully you're more interested in something understanding the truth, rather than the truth as someone else does. Understanding the truth itself is the goal and the most important thing. In His Grip, christian_concern@yahoo.com
_________________ I believe in Christianity as I believe that the Sun has risen – not only because I see it, but because by it, I see everything else. - C.S. Lewis, Is Theology Poetry?-
|
| Sun Jan 31, 2010 10:06 pm |
|
 |
|
spblat
Prolix
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 7:42 am Posts: 5573 Location: Portland
In a word: Compassionate serenity
|
 Re: Truth and persuasion
"Understanding the truth itself is the goal." Do you mean that is your goal for me? Is your goal for me to understand the truth? What is your strategy for achieving this goal?
_________________ "You're very sure of your facts," he said at last, "I couldn't trust the thinking of a man who takes the Universe—if there is one—for granted." -- Douglas Adams
Are you on Facebook? Become a DH fan!
|
| Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:54 pm |
|
 |
|
gomtuu77
Founding Member
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 8:37 pm Posts: 3601
In a word: Christ Follower
|
 Re: Truth and persuasion
"Understanding the truth itself is the goal." Do you mean that is your goal for me? Is your goal for me to understand the truth? What is your strategy for achieving this goal? No, I mean that it should be anyone's goal. My goal, for example, is not to get you to agree with me. It is to get you to agree with the truth, regardless of what I or anyone else might think. The truth is the most important thing. My strategy is simply to engage the ideas presented and to the extent they are false, provide reasonable counter-arguments and/or refutations, as well any evidence that may be available to me in this somewhat off-the-cuff forum format. In His Grip, christian_concern@yahoo.com
_________________ I believe in Christianity as I believe that the Sun has risen – not only because I see it, but because by it, I see everything else. - C.S. Lewis, Is Theology Poetry?-
|
| Sun Jan 31, 2010 11:59 pm |
|
 |
|
spblat
Prolix
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 7:42 am Posts: 5573 Location: Portland
In a word: Compassionate serenity
|
 Re: Truth and persuasion
My strategy is simply to engage the ideas presented and to the extent they are false, provide reasonable counter-arguments and/or refutations, as well any evidence that may be available to me in this somewhat off-the-cuff forum format. Would you call this strategy "persuasion"? And what of my earlier questions? 1) We have disagreements. True or false?
2) When we explore our disagreements we sometimes observe in our interlocutors an inability (or unwillingness) to recognize the truth of an assertion or a premise that we believe (or know to be) the truth. True or false?
3) Persuasion is necessary if we are to have meaningful debate. True or false?
...
What is the difference between a fact and an opinion?
_________________ "You're very sure of your facts," he said at last, "I couldn't trust the thinking of a man who takes the Universe—if there is one—for granted." -- Douglas Adams
Are you on Facebook? Become a DH fan!
|
| Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:05 am |
|
 |
|
gomtuu77
Founding Member
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 8:37 pm Posts: 3601
In a word: Christ Follower
|
 Re: Truth and persuasion
Would you call this strategy "persuasion"? Not necessarily. I've called it many things, including an exercise in futility. But yes, it could qualify as persuasion. And what of my earlier questions? What of them? I responded to a single post. 1) We have disagreements. True or false? True. 2) When we explore our disagreements we sometimes observe in our interlocutors an inability (or unwillingness) to recognize the truth of an assertion or a premise that we believe (or know to be) the truth. True or false? True. I would add that we recognize an inability (or unwillingness) to be persuaded as well. 3) Persuasion is necessary if we are to have meaningful debate. True or false? Yes, assuming that such a thing is possible. It will not always be the case. I don't always think it is possible, though I still often make an effort. But when evidence and/or argumentation is marshalled, it often has ZERO impact. At least, impact that is detectable from the other side. Plus I think some people, including myself, are simply dismissed at the outset before anything is said, simply because of who the information or argumentation is coming from. The genetic fallacy run amok you might say. What is the difference between a fact and an opinion? The first difference would be their truthfulness. If we accept that facts are, by their nature, true, can we also accept that opinions can be either true or false...can we not? A fact is a true statement or state of affairs regarding objective reality, while an opinion is a representation of a fact. Whether an opinion is an accurate representation of a fact of reality determine's its truthfulness. However, I am also comfortable saying that an opinion that is a true and/or accurate respresentation of a fact of reality would be a fact as well. Does that make sense? In His Grip, christian_concern@yahoo.com
_________________ I believe in Christianity as I believe that the Sun has risen – not only because I see it, but because by it, I see everything else. - C.S. Lewis, Is Theology Poetry?-
Last edited by gomtuu77 on Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:30 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
| Mon Feb 01, 2010 12:49 am |
|
 |
|
spblat
Prolix
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 7:42 am Posts: 5573 Location: Portland
In a word: Compassionate serenity
|
 Re: Truth and persuasion
It is consistent with what I already know about you. Quote: But when evidence and/or argumentation is marshalled, it often has ZERO impact. Do you generally attribute this result to intransigence on the part of your interlocutor(s)? Does it seem to you that each of us (I refer to me and you specifically) often sees the other as intransigent?
_________________ "You're very sure of your facts," he said at last, "I couldn't trust the thinking of a man who takes the Universe—if there is one—for granted." -- Douglas Adams
Are you on Facebook? Become a DH fan!
|
| Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:25 am |
|
 |
|
gomtuu77
Founding Member
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 8:37 pm Posts: 3601
In a word: Christ Follower
|
 Re: Truth and persuasion
Do you generally attribute this result to intransigence on the part of your interlocutor(s)? It depends on the person and the circumstances. You can often get a sense of whether someone is really interested in understanding something or having a genuine conversation or whether they are simply throwing up a wall of objections designed to help nothing be accomplished. But people turn on and off in that respect. For example, I've seen you do both things, but it depends somewhat on the topic, your mood, the various approaches taken to the topic, etc... And people are just different. I've known people in my past who were always inquisitive, but I never thought that automatically meant that they would eventually see things my way. The will of a person is the central issue, and no amount of talking on my part will change the will of a human being who is bent on maintaining a certain position. But since you can't tell who is that way and who is open to changing their mind, as both can appear highly or totally convinced of their point of view, you just have to dive in and see what happens. At the very least, you might gain additional understanding, and that's something positive to take away from any conversation. Does it seem to you that each of us (I refer to me and you specifically) often sees the other as intransigent? Well, given that I'm told this it seems like about 1/5th of the time you choose to respond to me, I'd have to say yes. However, I will say that I have seen you show openess from time to time...a willingness to discuss and ask questions without the more obvious hand-waiving objections, seemingly willful misinterpretations, etc... While I am a realist (no silly illusions of success), I'm still hopeful that something positive can come out of each encounter. That is, until that hope is forcibly ripped from me. Hehehe... In His Grip, christian_concern@yahoo.com
_________________ I believe in Christianity as I believe that the Sun has risen – not only because I see it, but because by it, I see everything else. - C.S. Lewis, Is Theology Poetry?-
|
| Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:37 am |
|
 |
|
spblat
Prolix
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 7:42 am Posts: 5573 Location: Portland
In a word: Compassionate serenity
|
 Re: Truth and persuasion
_________________ "You're very sure of your facts," he said at last, "I couldn't trust the thinking of a man who takes the Universe—if there is one—for granted." -- Douglas Adams
Are you on Facebook? Become a DH fan!
|
| Mon Feb 01, 2010 8:54 am |
|
 |
|
Elman
Founding Member
Joined: Thu Jun 28, 2007 6:08 am Posts: 2131
|
 Re: Truth and persuasion
Do you generally attribute this result to intransigence on the part of your interlocutor(s)? It depends on the person and the circumstances. You can often get a sense of whether someone is really interested in understanding something or having a genuine conversation or whether they are simply throwing up a wall of objections designed to help nothing be accomplished. But people turn on and off in that respect. For example, I've seen you do both things, but it depends somewhat on the topic, your mood, the various approaches taken to the topic, etc... And people are just different. I've known people in my past who were always inquisitive, but I never thought that automatically meant that they would eventually see things my way. The will of a person is the central issue, and no amount of talking on my part will change the will of a human being who is bent on maintaining a certain position. But since you can't tell who is that way and who is open to changing their mind, as both can appear highly or totally convinced of their point of view, you just have to dive in and see what happens. At the very least, you might gain additional understanding, and that's something positive to take away from any conversation. Does it seem to you that each of us (I refer to me and you specifically) often sees the other as intransigent? Well, given that I'm told this it seems like about 1/5th of the time you choose to respond to me, I'd have to say yes. However, I will say that I have seen you show openess from time to time...a willingness to discuss and ask questions without the more obvious hand-waiving objections, seemingly willful misinterpretations, etc... While I am a realist (no silly illusions of success), I'm still hopeful that something positive can come out of each encounter. That is, until that hope is forcibly ripped from me. Hehehe... In His Grip, christian_concern@yahoo.comI think sometimes we have conversations which seem to have not changed anyone's perceptions or ideas, and at the time seem a waste of time. Yet later, perhaps even years later this converstion will be brought back in our memory and we will then be open to change our position from what we thought or believed at the time.
_________________ I believe in a loving Creator who created us to respond to the love of the Creator. Our first gift of life is temporary. If we attempt to fulfill our purpose of loving others, we have the hope of receiving a second gift of eternal life.
|
| Mon Feb 01, 2010 10:46 am |
|
 |
|
spblat
Prolix
Joined: Sat Jun 16, 2007 7:42 am Posts: 5573 Location: Portland
In a word: Compassionate serenity
|
 Re: Truth and persuasion
...I would say that being persuasive is one thing. Persuading another is quite another matter. I thought Gom's assertion above was appropriate to this thread. Let me be bold and say I think it is a cop out to claim (or imply) without evidence that if you are not persuasive, it is acceptable to conclude that your interlocutor cannot be persuaded. If you are unpersuasive, there are at least three possible explanations for it: - You are arguing an untrue assertion.
- Your argument is flawed, incomplete or unintelligible.
- Your interlocutor is unable or unwilling to recognize the persuasiveness of your argument.
Jumping to #3 without evidence (even by implication, as I believe Gom has above) is in my opinion harmful to productive discourse. Even so, taking the #3 position doesn't have to mean the end of the conversation. Someone who concludes that his or her interlocutor is unable or unwilling to recognize the persuasiveness of an argument always has the opportunity to dig deeper. Why is my argument not hitting home? What preconceptions am I or my interlocutor holding onto that are preventing understanding? How can I make my argument stronger, or if necessary demonstrate that my interlocutor's preconceptions are incorrect? My conversations with Gom are most rewarding when he takes this approach rather than taking the easy way out and implying intransigence.
_________________ "You're very sure of your facts," he said at last, "I couldn't trust the thinking of a man who takes the Universe—if there is one—for granted." -- Douglas Adams
Are you on Facebook? Become a DH fan!
|
| Sat Aug 14, 2010 7:49 am |
|
 |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|